In re Cross

New York Court of Chancery

In re Cross

2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 3, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 467

New York Court of Chancery·Decided March 1, 1842·Published

Opinion

Application of the lunatic to be restored to his estate denied on three grounds: ° 1st. That the petition is defective in being sworn to before the solicitor of the petitioner: 2d. That the jurat does not state that the officer who swore the petitioner examined him as to the state of his mind, and that he believed him to be sane: 3d. That the petitioner has been found a lunatic, and it does not appear that there has been any change in his situation for the better, since the inquisition was found.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application of the lunatic to be restored to his estate denied on three grounds: ° 1st. That the petition is defective in being sworn to before the solicitor of the petitioner: 2d. That the jurat does not state that the officer who swore the petitioner examined him as to the state of his mind, and that he believed him to be sane: 3d. That the petitioner has been found a lunatic, and it does not appear that there has been any change in his situation for the better, since the inquisition was found.

In re Cross, 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 3, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 467 (N.Y. 1842).

Pincite

2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 3 (In re Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.