In re Cross

New York Court of Chancery

In re Cross

2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 3, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 467

DecidedMarch 1, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 3 (In re Cross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cross, 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 3, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 467 (N.Y. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

Application of the lunatic to be restored to his estate denied on three grounds: ° 1st. That the petition is defective in being sworn to before the solicitor of the petitioner: 2d. That the jurat does not state that the officer who swore the petitioner examined him as to the state of his mind, and that he believed him to be sane: 3d. That the petitioner has been found a lunatic, and it does not appear that there has been any change in his situation for the better, since the inquisition was found.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application of the lunatic to be restored to his estate denied on three grounds: ° 1st. That the petition is defective in being sworn to before the solicitor of the petitioner: 2d. That the jurat does not state that the officer who swore the petitioner examined him as to the state of his mind, and that he believed him to be sane: 3d. That the petitioner has been found a lunatic, and it does not appear that there has been any change in his situation for the better, since the inquisition was found.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 3, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cross-nychanct-1842.