In re Cross

Fourth Circuit

In re Cross

414 F. App'x 520

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2011·No. No. 11-1033·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Franklin Cross, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Franklin Cross, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Cross, 414 F. App'x 520 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

414 F. App'x 520 (In re Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related