In re Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co.

D.C. Circuit

In re Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co.

47 App. D.C. 382, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2426

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 4, 1918

DocketNo. 1135

StatusPublished

This text of 47 App. D.C. 382 (In re Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co., 47 App. D.C. 382, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2426 (D.C. Cir. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Nobis

delivered the opinion of the Court:.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent Office denying registration of the words “High-Efficiency'5 as a trademark for safety relief valve's.

AVe agree with the Patent Office that this mark is more descriptive than suggestive, and lienee that, under the numerous decisions of this court, it is not subject to exclusive appropriation.

The decision is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Nobis

delivered the opinion of the Court:.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent Office denying registration of the words “High-Efficiency'5 as a trademark for safety relief valve's.

AVe agree with the Patent Office that this mark is more descriptive than suggestive, and lienee that, under the numerous decisions of this court, it is not subject to exclusive appropriation.

The decision is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 App. D.C. 382, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crosby-steam-gage-valve-co-cadc-1918.