In re Crosby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Crosby

285 A.D. 859, 136 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 859 (In re Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Crosby, 285 A.D. 859, 136 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Application for reinstatement granted. Memorandum: Upon reapplication, the petitioner has presented new evidence from which we are able to conclude that he is now possessed of a firm intention to conduct himself as an attorney in accordance with the standards set forth in the canons of legal ethics, as such canons are generally construed and understood by the Bench and Bar, and we, therefore, grant the petitioner’s application. Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application for reinstatement granted. Memorandum: Upon reapplication, the petitioner has presented new evidence from which we are able to conclude that he is now possessed of a firm intention to conduct himself as an attorney in accordance with the standards set forth in the canons of legal ethics, as such canons are generally construed and understood by the Bench and Bar, and we, therefore, grant the petitioner’s application. Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 859, 136 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crosby-nyappdiv-1955.