In re Crosby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Crosby

285 A.D. 859, 136 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Crosby. Read the opinion of the Court — 281 A.D. 801 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 1955·Published

Opinion

Application for reinstatement granted. Memorandum: Upon reapplication, the petitioner has presented new evidence from which we are able to conclude that he is now possessed of a firm intention to conduct himself as an attorney in accordance with the standards set forth in the canons of legal ethics, as such canons are generally construed and understood by the Bench and Bar, and we, therefore, grant the petitioner’s application. Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application for reinstatement granted. Memorandum: Upon reapplication, the petitioner has presented new evidence from which we are able to conclude that he is now possessed of a firm intention to conduct himself as an attorney in accordance with the standards set forth in the canons of legal ethics, as such canons are generally construed and understood by the Bench and Bar, and we, therefore, grant the petitioner’s application. Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

In re Crosby, 285 A.D. 859, 136 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

285 A.D. 859 (In re Crosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.