In re Crosby

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Crosby

367 S.E.2d 41, 258 Ga. 92

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 16, 1988

DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary No. 526

StatusPublished

This text of 367 S.E.2d 41 (In re Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Crosby, 367 S.E.2d 41, 258 Ga. 92 (Ga. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

Abe Crosby, Jr. petitioned the State Bar of Georgia for reinstatement to the practice of law after having voluntarily surrendered his license in 1975. At that time he was convicted of misdemeanor conspiracy and felony theft by taking, and was sentenced to five years in prison. His 1982 petition for reinstatement received a favorable recommendation by the Special Master, but was denied by the Review Panel of the Disciplinary Board due to lack of passage of sufficient time. We affirmed the Review Panel’s decision. In the Matter of Crosby, 252 Ga. 153 (312 SE2d 116) (1984).

Here, the Special Master has again recommended reinstatement and the Review Panel has approved his recommendation. We adopt the recommendation of the Review Panel and approve Crosby’s reinstatement.

Reinstatement approved.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

Abe Crosby, Jr. petitioned the State Bar of Georgia for reinstatement to the practice of law after having voluntarily surrendered his license in 1975. At that time he was convicted of misdemeanor conspiracy and felony theft by taking, and was sentenced to five years in prison. His 1982 petition for reinstatement received a favorable recommendation by the Special Master, but was denied by the Review Panel of the Disciplinary Board due to lack of passage of sufficient time. We affirmed the Review Panel’s decision. In the Matter of Crosby, 252 Ga. 153 (312 SE2d 116) (1984).

Here, the Special Master has again recommended reinstatement and the Review Panel has approved his recommendation. We adopt the recommendation of the Review Panel and approve Crosby’s reinstatement.

Reinstatement approved.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

367 S.E.2d 41, 258 Ga. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crosby-ga-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack