In re Crockett

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Crockett

855 A.2d 282, 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 390, 2004 WL 1575369

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 15, 2004

DocketNo. 04-BS-750

StatusPublished

This text of 855 A.2d 282 (In re Crockett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Crockett, 855 A.2d 282, 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 390, 2004 WL 1575369 (D.C. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 13(c), for suspension of respondent for disability and to hold all disciplinary proceedings against respondent in abeyance, and respondent having interposed no objection thereto, it is

ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, and that all disciplinary matters pending against respondent be held in abeyance until further order of the Court, pursuant to Rule XI, § 13(e). Respondent’s reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar shall be in accordance with the provisions of D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 13(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g), and shall serve copies of the affidavit on Bar Counsel and the Board on Professional Responsibility.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 13(c), for suspension of respondent for disability and to hold all disciplinary proceedings against respondent in abeyance, and respondent having interposed no objection thereto, it is

ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, and that all disciplinary matters pending against respondent be held in abeyance until further order of the Court, pursuant to Rule XI, § 13(e). Respondent’s reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar shall be in accordance with the provisions of D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 13(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g), and shall serve copies of the affidavit on Bar Counsel and the Board on Professional Responsibility.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

855 A.2d 282, 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 390, 2004 WL 1575369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crockett-dc-2004.