In re Crews

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Crews

392 S.E.2d 532, 260 Ga. 90, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 132

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 12, 1990

DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary Nos. 670, 762

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 392 S.E.2d 532 (In re Crews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Crews, 392 S.E.2d 532, 260 Ga. 90, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 132 (Ga. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

The State Bar of Georgia filed two complaints against H. Burton Crews, Jr. In both of those complaints, the State Bar alleged violations of Standards 4, 44, and 45 of State Bar of Georgia Rule 4-102. In the second complaint, docketed as Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 762, the State Bar alleged the additional violations of Standards 22, 23, 61, 63, and 68 of State Bar of Georgia Rule 4-102. In his petition for voluntary discipline in S.C.D. No. 670, the first complaint, Crews admitted violating Standard 44 and petitioned for a thirty-day suspension. The State Bar recommends we accept this petition. In his petition for voluntary discipline in S.C.D. No. 762, Crews admitted violations of Standards 44, 45 (f), and 68 and petitioned for a thirty-day suspension to run concurrent with the suspension in S.C.D. No. 670. The State Bar recommends we accept this petition as well.

We accept the State Bar’s recommendations and order that Crews be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days for his admitted violation in S.C.D. 670 and that he be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days, to run concurrent with the aforeordered suspension, for his violations in S.C.D. 762.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The State Bar of Georgia filed two complaints against H. Burton Crews, Jr. In both of those complaints, the State Bar alleged violations of Standards 4, 44, and 45 of State Bar of Georgia Rule 4-102. In the second complaint, docketed as Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 762, the State Bar alleged the additional violations of Standards 22, 23, 61, 63, and 68 of State Bar of Georgia Rule 4-102. In his petition for voluntary discipline in S.C.D. No. 670, the first complaint, Crews admitted violating Standard 44 and petitioned for a thirty-day suspension. The State Bar recommends we accept this petition. In his petition for voluntary discipline in S.C.D. No. 762, Crews admitted violations of Standards 44, 45 (f), and 68 and petitioned for a thirty-day suspension to run concurrent with the suspension in S.C.D. No. 670. The State Bar recommends we accept this petition as well.

We accept the State Bar’s recommendations and order that Crews be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days for his admitted violation in S.C.D. 670 and that he be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days, to run concurrent with the aforeordered suspension, for his violations in S.C.D. 762.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

392 S.E.2d 532, 260 Ga. 90, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crews-ga-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack