in Re: Crest Energy, Inc. and Edwin P. Horan, III

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re: Crest Energy, Inc. and Edwin P. Horan, III

DecidedMarch 27, 2003

Docket14-03-00348-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Crest Energy, Inc. and Edwin P. Horan, III (in Re: Crest Energy, Inc. and Edwin P. Horan, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re: Crest Energy, Inc. and Edwin P. Horan, III, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed March 27, 2003

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed March 27, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-03-00348-CV

IN RE CREST ENERGY, INC. and EDWIN P. HORAN, III, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On March 27, 2003, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator also filed a motion for emergency stay.

A party seeking mandamus relief must generally bring forward all that is necessary to establish the claim for relief. Tex .R. App. P. 52.7. This includes providing an adequate record to substantiate the allegations contained in the petition for mandamus. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.1992). Without a sufficient record, a party seeking mandamus relief has not proved any entitlement to the writ. Id.; Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(2).

Because relator has not provided a sufficient record to prove its entitlement to relief, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Opinion filed March 27, 2003.

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Seymore, and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI