In re Creson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Creson

545 S.E.2d 270, 344 S.C. 366, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 31

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 12, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On September 9, 1999, this Court imposed concurrent six month and one year suspensions on petitioner, retroactive to March 8, 1999. In the Matter of Creson, 336 S.C. 565, 521 S.E.2d 274 (1999). Petitioner has now filed a petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness recommends that the petition be granted. We agree and hereby reinstate petitioner to the practice of law in this state.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

/s/ James E. Moore, J.

/s/ John H. Waller, Jr„ J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III,. J.

/s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On September 9, 1999, this Court imposed concurrent six month and one year suspensions on petitioner, retroactive to March 8, 1999. In the Matter of Creson, 336 S.C. 565, 521 S.E.2d 274 (1999). Petitioner has now filed a petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness recommends that the petition be granted. We agree and hereby reinstate petitioner to the practice of law in this state.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

/s/ James E. Moore, J.

/s/ John H. Waller, Jr„ J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III,. J.

/s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J.

In re Creson, 545 S.E.2d 270, 344 S.C. 366, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 31 (S.C. 2001).

Pincite

545 S.E.2d 270 (In re Creson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related