In re Crescenzi
This text of 109 A.D.2d 655 (In re Crescenzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Motion granted to the extent of enjoining the use of the letterhead described in the order of this court, but respondent permitted to use a letterhead indicating that he is admitted to practice only before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and, under certain restrictions, before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, all as indicated in the order of this court. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Asch and Milonas, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 A.D.2d 655, 491 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crescenzi-nyappdiv-1985.