In re Crescenzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Crescenzi

109 A.D.2d 655, 491 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47135

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1985·Published

Opinion

— Motion granted to the extent of enjoining the use of the letterhead described in the order of this court, but respondent permitted to use a letterhead indicating that he is admitted to practice only before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and, under certain restrictions, before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, all as indicated in the order of this court. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Asch and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion granted to the extent of enjoining the use of the letterhead described in the order of this court, but respondent permitted to use a letterhead indicating that he is admitted to practice only before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and, under certain restrictions, before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, all as indicated in the order of this court. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Asch and Milonas, JJ.

In re Crescenzi, 109 A.D.2d 655, 491 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

109 A.D.2d 655 (In re Crescenzi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.