In re Crescenzi
64 N.Y.2d 774
This text of 64 N.Y.2d 774 (In re Crescenzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Crescenzi, 64 N.Y.2d 774 (N.Y. 1985).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed. Dismissal of the appeal taken as of right for lack of prosecution was a determination on the merits of all claims which could have been litigated had that appeal been timely argued or submitted (Bray v Cox, 38 NY2d 350). [See, 64 NY2d 648.]
Judge Alexander taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCauley v. Drumm
217 A.D.2d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Peavey v. Polytechnic Institute of New York
768 F. Supp. 35 (E.D. New York, 1990)
Capone v. Chesebrough Pond's, Inc.
492 N.E.2d 1230 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Corley
491 N.E.2d 1090 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
64 N.Y.2d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crescenzi-ny-1985.