In re Craven

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Craven

719 S.E.2d 648, 395 S.C. 477, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 391

DecidedDecember 6, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 719 S.E.2d 648 (In re Craven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Craven, 719 S.E.2d 648, 395 S.C. 477, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 391 (S.C. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

By order dated October 19, 2011, the Court granted petitioner’s Petition for Reinstatement, subject to certain conditions. One condition provided that, prior to reinstatement, petitioner shall pay Pete Reid, his former law partner, at least $1,000.00 towards the outstanding judgment owed Mr. Reid and submit proof of the payment to the Clerk of Court. Petitioner has now provided proof of payment of $1,000.00 to [478]*478Mr. Reid and requests the Court reinstate him to the practice of law.

The petition is granted. Petitioner is hereby reinstated to the practice of law. He is reminded that he shall comply with the remaining conditions stated in the Court’s October 19, 2011, order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J. /s/Costa M. Pleicones, J. /s/Donald W. Beatty, J. /s/John W. Kittredge, J. /s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

By order dated October 19, 2011, the Court granted petitioner’s Petition for Reinstatement, subject to certain conditions. One condition provided that, prior to reinstatement, petitioner shall pay Pete Reid, his former law partner, at least $1,000.00 towards the outstanding judgment owed Mr. Reid and submit proof of the payment to the Clerk of Court. Petitioner has now provided proof of payment of $1,000.00 to [478]*478Mr. Reid and requests the Court reinstate him to the practice of law.

The petition is granted. Petitioner is hereby reinstated to the practice of law. He is reminded that he shall comply with the remaining conditions stated in the Court’s October 19, 2011, order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Jean H. Toal, C.J. /s/Costa M. Pleicones, J. /s/Donald W. Beatty, J. /s/John W. Kittredge, J. /s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 S.E.2d 648, 395 S.C. 477, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-craven-sc-2011.