In re Craig

515 S.E.2d 257, 334 S.C. 622, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 64
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 16, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 515 S.E.2d 257 (In re Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Craig, 515 S.E.2d 257, 334 S.C. 622, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 64 (S.C. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this State is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Susan P. MacDonald, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Ms. MacDonald shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Ms. MacDonald may make [623]*623disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Susan P. MacDonald, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
515 S.E.2d 257, 334 S.C. 622, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-craig-sc-1999.