In re Craig
This text of 249 S.E.2d 915 (In re Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
INDEFINITE SUSPENSION
This is a grievance proceeding charging the respondent, Billy R. Craig, with commingling his clients’ trust funds. Mr. Craig previously received a public reprimand for similar misconduct. See In the Matter of Billy R. Craig, 269 S. C. 17, 235 S. E. (2d) 811 (1977).
The Panel and the Executive Committee of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline both found respondent' guilty of misconduct but disagreed on the sanction to be imposed. The Panel recommended a public reprimand and the full Board recommended an indefinite suspension.
We conclude respondent’s misconduct warrants an imposition of indefinite suspension. Accordingly, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in this State and that he within five days surrender his certificate of admission to practice to the Clerk of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 S.E.2d 915, 272 S.C. 197, 1978 S.C. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-craig-sc-1978.