in Re Craig Albine Anderson and Gayle June Anderson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 21, 2014
Docket14-14-00580-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Craig Albine Anderson and Gayle June Anderson (in Re Craig Albine Anderson and Gayle June Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Craig Albine Anderson and Gayle June Anderson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 21, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00580-CV

IN RE CRAIG ALBIN ANDERSON AND GAYLE JUNE ANDERSON, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 343,142-401

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 17, 2014, relators Craig Albin Anderson and Gayle June Anderson filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Rory R. Olsen, presiding judge of Probate Court No. 3 of Harris County, to set aside his June 19, 2014 order denying their motion to disqualify real party in interest’s attorneys. Relators have not shown that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Craig Albine Anderson and Gayle June Anderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-craig-albine-anderson-and-gayle-june-anderso-texapp-2014.