in Re Craft & Design
This text of in Re Craft & Design (in Re Craft & Design) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 24, 2020
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00775-CV ——————————— IN RE CRAFT & DESIGN, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Craft & Design, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus,
challenging the trial court’s October 27, 2020 order denying its motion for summary
judgment.1
We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
1 The underlying case is Craft & Design v. 3i Contracting LLC, Cause No. 2019-40584, in the 55th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Latosha Lewis Payne presiding. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that is only available in limited
circumstances. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992). To be
entitled to mandamus relief, the relator must show both that the trial court abused its
discretion and that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Prudential Ins.
Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004).
Relator asserts in its petition for writ of mandamus that the trial court abused
its discretion by denying its motion for summary judgment. However, “mandamus
is generally unavailable when a trial court denies summary judgment, no matter how
meritorious the motion.” See United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 307 S.W.3d 299, 314 (Tex.
2010); In re McAllen Med. Ctr., Inc., 275 S.W.3d 458, 465 (Tex. 2008). Because
relator has an adequate remedy by appeal, mandamus relief is not appropriate. See
In re McAllen Med. Ctr., Inc., 275 S.W.3d at 465–66 (denial of summary judgment
does not deprive relator of appellate remedy as “trying a case in which summary
judgment would have been appropriate does not mean the case will have to be tried
twice”).
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. All pending
motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hightower, and Countiss
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Craft & Design, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-craft-design-texapp-2020.