In re Cox

172 A.D. 897, 156 N.Y.S. 1119

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cox, 172 A.D. 897, 156 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

172 A.D. 897 (In re Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.