In re Courtois

720 A.2d 560, 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 216, 1998 WL 800105
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 1998·No. No. 96-BG-1642·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that the court disbar respondent on consent pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12(b). That recommendation comes in the wake of respondent’s consent to disbarment in Maryland following his conviction in the United States District Court on two counts of tax evasion.

We accept the Board’s recommendation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that respondent Gary A Courtois be disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia nunc pro tunc to February 14,1997, the date on which he filed an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). Further, the reciprocal discipline matter pending before this court and the Board is dismissed, without prejudice to Bar Counsel’s reinstituting it should respondent seek reinstatement while his Maryland disbarment is in effect. See In re Ferber, 703 A.2d 142, n. 2 (D.C.1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Courtois, 720 A.2d 560, 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 216, 1998 WL 800105 (D.C. 1998).

720 A.2d 560 (In re Courtois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Courtois
931 A.2d 1015 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)