In re Courtney

897 A.2d 1158
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 3, 2006
DocketNo. 1087 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 897 A.2d 1158 (In re Courtney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Courtney, 897 A.2d 1158 (Pa. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2006, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 29, 2005, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Steven C. Courtney to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, Steven C. Courtney is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Madame Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
897 A.2d 1158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-courtney-pa-2006.