in Re Courtney Nixon

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 25, 2013·No. 01-13-00842-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00842-CV Style: In re Courtney Nixon

Date motion filed*: October 25, 2013 Agreed Second Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Petition for Writ Type of motion: of Mandamus Party filing motion: Real Party In Interest Document to be filed: Real Party In Interest’s Response

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: October 18, 2013 Number of prior extensions: 1 Current Due date: October 25, 2013 Date Requested: November 8, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: November 8, 2013  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: October 25, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI