In re County of Westchester
237 A.D. 833
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion the learned Special Term was without power to make the order appealed from. The claimant, MacEwen, cannot, in our opinion, have the validity of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of New Rochelle determined in this proceeding. Her remedy is by the institution of an action for a declaratory judgment. (See Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257 N. Y. 221, 225.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re County of Westchester, 237 A.D. 833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
237 A.D. 833 (In re County of Westchester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Congressional School of Aeronautics, Inc. v. State Roads Commission
146 A.2d 558 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. State
103 A.D.2d 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
MacEwen v. City of New Rochelle
149 Misc. 251 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)