In re County of Erie

188 A.D.2d 1053

Opinion

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at County Court. We add only that there is no merit to intervenors’ contention that County Court lacked equitable power to grant relief to petitioner (see, Judiciary Law § 190-b; Erie County Tax Act § 11-9.0; Polish Natl. Alliance v White Eagle Hall Co., 98 AD2d 400; see also, Guardian Loan Co. v Early, 47 NY2d 515, 521; New York Guardian Mortgagee Corp. v Rodriguez, 139 AD2d 711, 712; Glenville & 110 Corp. v Tortora, 137 AD2d 654, lv denied 72 NY2d 806). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Tax Foreclosure.) Present— Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re County of Erie, 188 A.D.2d 1053 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

188 A.D.2d 1053 (In re County of Erie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guardian Loan Co. v. Early
392 N.E.2d 1240 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Polish National Alliance of Brooklyn, U.S.A. v. White Eagle Hall Co.
98 A.D.2d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Glenville & 110 Corp. v. Tortora
137 A.D.2d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
New York Guardian Mortgagee Corp. v. Rodriguez
139 A.D.2d 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)