In re County Conduit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re County Conduit Corp.

49 A.D.3d 641, 852 N.Y.2d 788

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

“The report of a Referee should be confirmed whenever the findings are substantially supported by the record, and the Referee has clearly defined the issues and resolved matters of credibility” (Thomas v Thomas, 21 AD3d 949, 949 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; Matter of Smiros v Lopez, 251 AD2d 587 [1998]). Here, the Referee’s findings regarding the value of the subject real property are substantially supported by the record and will not be disturbed.

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

“The report of a Referee should be confirmed whenever the findings are substantially supported by the record, and the Referee has clearly defined the issues and resolved matters of credibility” (Thomas v Thomas, 21 AD3d 949, 949 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; Matter of Smiros v Lopez, 251 AD2d 587 [1998]). Here, the Referee’s findings regarding the value of the subject real property are substantially supported by the record and will not be disturbed.

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

In re County Conduit Corp., 49 A.D.3d 641, 852 N.Y.2d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

49 A.D.3d 641 (In re County Conduit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related