Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/In re Costill

In re Costill

810 A.2d 1076, 174 N.J. 563, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1778
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 11, 2002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 02-195, concluding that KEITH A. COSTILL of PENNINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded on the basis of his guilty plea to the fourth-degree crime of child abuse and neglect (N.J.S.A. 9:6-1 and 9:6-3), conduct in violation of RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KEITH A. COSTILL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[564] ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Costill, 810 A.2d 1076, 174 N.J. 563, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1778 (N.J. 2002).

810 A.2d 1076 (In re Costill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.