In re Coster

2 Johns. Ch. 502
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedJune 13, 1817
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Johns. Ch. 502 (In re Coster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Coster, 2 Johns. Ch. 502 (N.Y. 1817).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The obligor, having discharged his bond, is entitled to have it delivered up and cancelled. Neither the obligee, nor any other person, is entitled to retain it, for their convenience, without his assent. As there is no objection by the mortgagee to the assignment of the mortgage, the petitioner may take it; but the bond must be delivered up to the obligor, to whom it now belongs; and, if it had been insisted, the mortgage must have, also, been delivered up to him. A third person, discharging a bond and mortgage for his own safety, may be substituted, but when the maker discharges them, he is clearly entitled to have the instruments cancelled. The prayer of the petition is so far denied.

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnard v. . Onderdonk
98 N.Y. 158 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Ch. 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-coster-nychanct-1817.