In re Costello

268 A.D. 223, 50 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3150
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 20, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 268 A.D. 223 (In re Costello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Costello, 268 A.D. 223, 50 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The first order appealed from denied appellant’s motion to vacate a subpoena requiring his appearance at a hearing in proceedings pending before a Deputy Police Commissioner on an application to revoke a cabaret license. The second order appealed from held the appellant guilty of contempt in failing to take the stand and be sworn in the above-mentioned proceeding pursuant to the subpoena, permitting him, however, to purge himself by appearing and testifying at the hearings but otherwise adjudging that on his failure to appear a warrant may issue committing him to jail.

After the argument of the appeals, the Corporation Counsel informed the court that the pending proceedings before the Police Commissioner had been terminated. Accordingly the subject matter of the controversy has ceased to exist, the issues have become academic, and the appeals should be dismissed. (Delevan v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 216 N. Y. 359.) Relief may be had by application to Special Term to vacate, the orders in view of the termination of the proceedings in which they were issued.

The appeals should be dismissed, without prejudice to an application to Special Term to vacate the orders appealed from; meanwhile the stay granted on September 26,1944, is continued subject to the further order of this court.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ., concur.

Appeals unanimously dismissed, without prejudice to an application to Special Term to vacate the orders appealed from. Stay contained in order to show cause dated September 26, 1944, continued subject to the further order of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferrara v. Hynes
63 A.D.2d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Leone
56 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Nathan v. Silver
10 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Stratton v. Wylie
3 Misc. 2d 518 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D. 223, 50 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-costello-nyappdiv-1944.