In re Costanzo

580 A.2d 271, 121 N.J. 394, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1590
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 12, 1990
StatusPublished

This text of 580 A.2d 271 (In re Costanzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Costanzo, 580 A.2d 271, 121 N.J. 394, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1590 (N.J. 1990).

Opinion

ORDER

ERNEST N. COSTANZO of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1974, having been Ordered to show cause why he should not be suspended from the practice of law and sanctioned for his failure to pay administrative costs imposed by the Disciplinary Review Board;

And said ERNEST N. COSTANZO having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause;

And the Court having considered the report of the Disciplinary Review Board;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ERNEST N. COSTANZO shall be suspended from the practice of law, effective October 22, 1990, and until the further Order of the Court; provided, however, that respondent’s suspension shall not take effect if he makes full payment.of all administrative costs, plus interest, and a $250.00 sanction to the Disciplinary Review Board on or before October 19, 1990; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall be enjoined and restrained from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics, which governs suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 A.2d 271, 121 N.J. 394, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-costanzo-nj-1990.