In re Costanzo

867 A.2d 1039, 385 Md. 122, 2005 Md. LEXIS 39
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 9, 2005
DocketMisc. No. 4
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 867 A.2d 1039 (In re Costanzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Costanzo, 867 A.2d 1039, 385 Md. 122, 2005 Md. LEXIS 39 (Md. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered the favorable recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners for admission to the Bar of Maryland of the applicant, Frank M. Costanzo, the dissent of State Board member, John F. Mudd, Esquire, applicant’s memorandum in support of his application and the oral argument of applicant’s counsel presented at a hearing held before this Court on February 3, 2005, it is this 9th day of February, 2005

[123]*123ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the favorable recommendation of the State Board of Law Examiners be, and it is hereby, accepted, and it is further

ORDERED, that the applicant, Frank M. Costanzo, upon taking the oath prescribed by the statute, be admitted to the practice of law in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Application of Strzempek
962 A.2d 988 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2008)
Admission of Brown
895 A.2d 1050 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2006)
Application of Costanzo
867 A.2d 1039 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 A.2d 1039, 385 Md. 122, 2005 Md. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-costanzo-md-2005.