In re Costantino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Costantino

116 A.D.2d 611, 498 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51472

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Costantino. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 A.D.2d 353 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 17, 1986·Published

Opinion

by Motion byrespondent for reconsideration of this court’s decision dated March 5, 1984 [100 AD2d 979] which imposed a five-year suspension from the practice of law by the respondent and upon reconsideration to modify the suspension by reducing same to a two-year period, or in the alternative, to permit the respondent leave to apply for reinstatement after two years’ suspension.

Motion denied. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

by Motion byrespondent for reconsideration of this court’s decision dated March 5, 1984 [100 AD2d 979] which imposed a five-year suspension from the practice of law by the respondent and upon reconsideration to modify the suspension by reducing same to a two-year period, or in the alternative, to permit the respondent leave to apply for reinstatement after two years’ suspension.

Motion denied. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

In re Costantino, 116 A.D.2d 611, 498 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

116 A.D.2d 611 (In re Costantino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.