In re Cosgrove

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Cosgrove

275 A.D.2d 773

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 773 (In re Cosgrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cosgrove, 275 A.D.2d 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner is not “ the owner of the land ” within the meaning of section 275 of the Real Property Law. He is successor in interest merely of two of an unspecified number of legatees who, at best, are to share in personalty, namely, proceeds of the sale of realty in accordance with a mandatory direction contained in a will. (Delafield V. Barlow, 107 N. Y. 535; McDonald v. O’Hara, 144 N. Y. 566.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner is not “ the owner of the land ” within the meaning of section 275 of the Real Property Law. He is successor in interest merely of two of an unspecified number of legatees who, at best, are to share in personalty, namely, proceeds of the sale of realty in accordance with a mandatory direction contained in a will. (Delafield V. Barlow, 107 N. Y. 535; McDonald v. O’Hara, 144 N. Y. 566.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cosgrove-nyappdiv-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack