In re Cosgrove
This text of 262 A.D. 887 (In re Cosgrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Permitting himself to be persuaded by the hysteria of an emotional client, this attorney caused part of her real property to be conveyed to her children in the expectation that it would influence favorably the settlement of a claim by the city of New York against the client. Although there was no attempt to cover up or cloak the transaction and there will be no loss to the claimant because of it, and it appears that the attorney was not seeking personal benefit, yet his act, one of impulsive indiscretion, calls for censure by the court. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 887, 28 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cosgrove-nyappdiv-1941.