In Re Correa

California Court of Appeal

In Re Correa

172 P. 615, 36 Cal. App. 512, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 595

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 14, 1918

DocketCrim. No. 599.

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 172 P. 615 (In Re Correa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Correa, 172 P. 615, 36 Cal. App. 512, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 595 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Habeas corpus. Jose Correa is in the custody of the sheriff of the county of Orange under a commitment issued out of the justice’s court of Anaheim Township, Orange County. In that court Correa was convicted of an alleged misdemeanor pursuant to a complaint which charged that the defendant at the time and place named did “willfully and unlawfully expose his person,” etc. It is admitted that by the complaint it was attempted to charge the offense described in section 311 of the Penal Code. That section, so far as applicable to this ease, is as follows: “Every person who willfully and lewdly, either: One. Exposes his person, or the private parts thereof, in any public place, or in any place where there are present other persons to be offended or annoyed thereby; ... is guilty of a misdemeanor.”

It is manifest, upon an inspection of the complaint, that it failed to charge the offense described in the statute. It was not alleged that the acts described were done “lewdly,” nor were any words of equivalent meaning used in the complaint. An essential element of the crime being thus omitted, the complaint did not state a public offense.

It is ordered that the prisoner, the said Jose Correa, be discharged from custody.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Habeas corpus. Jose Correa is in the custody of the sheriff of the county of Orange under a commitment issued out of the justice’s court of Anaheim Township, Orange County. In that court Correa was convicted of an alleged misdemeanor pursuant to a complaint which charged that the defendant at the time and place named did “willfully and unlawfully expose his person,” etc. It is admitted that by the complaint it was attempted to charge the offense described in section 311 of the Penal Code. That section, so far as applicable to this ease, is as follows: “Every person who willfully and lewdly, either: One. Exposes his person, or the private parts thereof, in any public place, or in any place where there are present other persons to be offended or annoyed thereby; ... is guilty of a misdemeanor.”

It is manifest, upon an inspection of the complaint, that it failed to charge the offense described in the statute. It was not alleged that the acts described were done “lewdly,” nor were any words of equivalent meaning used in the complaint. An essential element of the crime being thus omitted, the complaint did not state a public offense.

It is ordered that the prisoner, the said Jose Correa, be discharged from custody.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 P. 615, 36 Cal. App. 512, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-correa-calctapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack