In re Corporation of the City of New-York

18 Johns. 506
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1821·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

‘ As the report of one set of commissioner^ has been set aside, and the otherá havd féfiised ¡to; act,'wb consider the application as if made before the appointment of any commissioners : And before commissioners, &e; aré appointed, or report made, we do not perceive hoVv áhyi'rig’htá' can be so vested ás to deprive the corporation of <he power of refusing to go on, or-that can require of this Court tb deny their application for leave' to discontinue all further proceedings. ; We, therefore^ grant the motion todiscon-tinue. ' ‘.,/|* Si 1 ■1 - 's-i ■ ■■ ■■ ■' sv tu,

Motion granted. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Corporation of the City of New-York, 18 Johns. 506 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1821).

18 Johns. 506 (In re Corporation of the City of New-York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Adirondack Railway Co.
39 A.D. 34 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)