In re Cornelia B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Cornelia B.

282 A.D.2d 745, 724 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4202

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 745 (In re Cornelia B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cornelia B., 282 A.D.2d 745, 724 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 for the appointment of a guardian for the person and property of Cornelia B., the objectant, Barbara B. P., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), dated November 30, 1999, which, inter alia, confirmed the sale of the interest in real property owned by Cornelia B.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although the objectant has appealed from an order which [746]*746confirmed the sale of Cornelia B.’s real property, she fails to raise any arguments relevant to that order. Instead, the only issues raised concern an earlier order of the same court, dated September 1, 1998, adjudicating Cornelia B. to be incapacitated and appointing a guardian. Accordingly, the order is affirmed (see, Matter of B., 272 AD2d 613). Altman, J. P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 for the appointment of a guardian for the person and property of Cornelia B., the objectant, Barbara B. P., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), dated November 30, 1999, which, inter alia, confirmed the sale of the interest in real property owned by Cornelia B.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although the objectant has appealed from an order which [746]*746confirmed the sale of Cornelia B.’s real property, she fails to raise any arguments relevant to that order. Instead, the only issues raised concern an earlier order of the same court, dated September 1, 1998, adjudicating Cornelia B. to be incapacitated and appointing a guardian. Accordingly, the order is affirmed (see, Matter of B., 272 AD2d 613). Altman, J. P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 745, 724 N.Y.S.2d 333, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cornelia-b-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack