In re Corbin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Corbin

89 N.Y.S. 1102

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 28, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 89 N.Y.S. 1102 (In re Corbin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Corbin, 89 N.Y.S. 1102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reargument ordered,'upon a day for the hearing of enumerated motions, to be agreed upon by counsel, at the next term, upon the following questions: (1) Whether the proof shows any warrant for the payments made on account of the Sunnyside Company beyond the repayment to the Corbin Banking Company of the overdraft paid before Mr. Corbin’s death. (2) Whether the proof suffices to establish a contract between Mr. Corbin and Mr. Pratt, enforceable after Mr. Corbin’s death, for the purchase of the Long Island Railroad Company’s stock. (3) Whether, in view of the fact that Mrs. Corbin’s life estate in the Fifth avenue property was restored to her, the taxes and expenses of maintenance were legally chargeable against Mr. Corbin’s estate..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Reargument ordered,'upon a day for the hearing of enumerated motions, to be agreed upon by counsel, at the next term, upon the following questions: (1) Whether the proof shows any warrant for the payments made on account of the Sunnyside Company beyond the repayment to the Corbin Banking Company of the overdraft paid before Mr. Corbin’s death. (2) Whether the proof suffices to establish a contract between Mr. Corbin and Mr. Pratt, enforceable after Mr. Corbin’s death, for the purchase of the Long Island Railroad Company’s stock. (3) Whether, in view of the fact that Mrs. Corbin’s life estate in the Fifth avenue property was restored to her, the taxes and expenses of maintenance were legally chargeable against Mr. Corbin’s estate..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 N.Y.S. 1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-corbin-nyappdiv-1904.