In re Copley

133 F. App'x 918
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 16, 2005
DocketNo. 05-6355
StatusPublished

This text of 133 F. App'x 918 (In re Copley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Copley, 133 F. App'x 918 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Craig O. Copley petitions for writ of mandamus seeking conditional release or discharge from his civil commitment. However, Copley’s appeal of the district court’s order revoking his conditional release is currently pending on appeal. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal, see In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979), and Copley may raise all claims of error in his pending case. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Copley’s petition. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [919]*919in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc
595 F.2d 958 (Fourth Circuit, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 F. App'x 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-copley-ca4-2005.