In re Cooperman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Cooperman

59 A.D.2d 749, 398 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13764

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On the court’s own motion, appeal by petitioner from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 29, 1976, denying her application for a change of name, dismissed, without prejudice to such other proceedings as petitioner may be advised to institute. An appeal from an ex parte order is not authorized (Matter of Bean v Stoddard, 207 App Div 276, affd 238 NY 618; Matter of Willmark Serv. System, 21 AD2d 478). In our opinion, review of this ex parte order does not come within the provisions of CPLR 5704 (subd [a]). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the court’s own motion, appeal by petitioner from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 29, 1976, denying her application for a change of name, dismissed, without prejudice to such other proceedings as petitioner may be advised to institute. An appeal from an ex parte order is not authorized (Matter of Bean v Stoddard, 207 App Div 276, affd 238 NY 618; Matter of Willmark Serv. System, 21 AD2d 478). In our opinion, review of this ex parte order does not come within the provisions of CPLR 5704 (subd [a]). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

In re Cooperman, 59 A.D.2d 749, 398 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

59 A.D.2d 749 (In re Cooperman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related