In re Cooper

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Cooper

754 S.E.2d 862, 407 S.C. 111, 2011 WL 5840552, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 367

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 16, 2011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

By order dated August 17, 2011, the Court placed respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 418, SCACR. In the Matter of Cooper, 394 S.C. 34, 714 S.E.2d 312 (2011). Thereafter, respondent filed a Petition for Reconsideration.

The Court grants the Petition for Reconsideration. Respondent is reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J. /s/COSTA M. PLEICONES, J. /s/DONALD W. BEATTY, J. /s/JOHN W. KITTREDGE, J. /s/KAYE G. HEARN, J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

By order dated August 17, 2011, the Court placed respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 418, SCACR. In the Matter of Cooper, 394 S.C. 34, 714 S.E.2d 312 (2011). Thereafter, respondent filed a Petition for Reconsideration.

The Court grants the Petition for Reconsideration. Respondent is reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J. /s/COSTA M. PLEICONES, J. /s/DONALD W. BEATTY, J. /s/JOHN W. KITTREDGE, J. /s/KAYE G. HEARN, J.

FOR THE COURT

In re Cooper, 754 S.E.2d 862, 407 S.C. 111, 2011 WL 5840552, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 367 (S.C. 2011).

Pincite

754 S.E.2d 862 (In re Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related