In Re Cooper

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In Re Cooper

654 S.E.2d 269, 375 S.C. 486, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 397

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedNovember 13, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 654 S.E.2d 269 (In Re Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Cooper, 654 S.E.2d 269, 375 S.C. 486, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 397 (S.C. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(c), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. The petition also seeks appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent’s clients pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Herbert W. Hamilton, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust aceount(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Hamilton shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Hamilton may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Herbert W. Hamilton, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Herbert W. Hamilton, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Hamilton’s office.

*487 Mr. Hamilton’s appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless an extension of the period of appointment is requested.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(c), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. The petition also seeks appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent’s clients pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Herbert W. Hamilton, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust aceount(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Hamilton shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Hamilton may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Herbert W. Hamilton, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Herbert W. Hamilton, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Hamilton’s office.

*487 Mr. Hamilton’s appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless an extension of the period of appointment is requested.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

654 S.E.2d 269, 375 S.C. 486, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cooper-sc-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack