In re Cooper

15 Johns. 533
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1818
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 15 Johns. 533 (In re Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cooper, 15 Johns. 533 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1818).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The notice in this case was not sufficient. The application to the Surrogate is a legal proceeding, affecting the rights of the patties interested in the land, who ought, therefore, to be duly apprised of it. On general principle, the notice ought to be in writing, and the want of it is a fatal objection to these proceedings. The motion must be granted, but without costs, as it is not a case within the statute relative to costs.

Motion granted accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Merritt
34 N.W. 689 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1887)
Pearson v. Lovejoy
53 Barb. 407 (New York Supreme Court, 1866)
Lane v. Cary
19 Barb. 537 (New York Supreme Court, 1855)
McEwen v. Montgomery County Mutual Insurance
5 Hill & Den. 101 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Johns. 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cooper-nysupct-1818.