In re Cooper

15 Johns. 533
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1818·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The notice in this case was not sufficient. The application to the Surrogate is a legal proceeding, affecting the rights of the patties interested in the land, who ought, therefore, to be duly apprised of it. On general principle, the notice ought to be in writing, and the want of it is a fatal objection to these proceedings. The motion must be granted, but without costs, as it is not a case within the statute relative to costs.

Motion granted accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cooper, 15 Johns. 533 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1818).

15 Johns. 533 (In re Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Merritt
34 N.W. 689 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1887)
Pearson v. Lovejoy
53 Barb. 407 (New York Supreme Court, 1866)
Lane v. Cary
19 Barb. 537 (New York Supreme Court, 1855)
McEwen v. Montgomery County Mutual Insurance
5 Hill & Den. 101 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)