In re Cooper

659 A.2d 1263, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 124, 1995 WL 378829
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 26, 1995
DocketNo. 94-BG-1394
StatusPublished

This text of 659 A.2d 1263 (In re Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cooper, 659 A.2d 1263, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 124, 1995 WL 378829 (D.C. 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the record herein and of the unanimous Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that Samuel Cooper III, previously sanctioned by order of this court, 613 A.2d 938 (D.C.1992), has by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16(d) met the condition of proof of rehabilitation [1264]*1264imposed by said order and that he accordingly should be reinstated as a member of the bar of this court, it is

ORDERED that Samuel Cooper III be, and he hereby is, reinstated as a member of the bar of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Cooper
613 A.2d 938 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
659 A.2d 1263, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 124, 1995 WL 378829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cooper-dc-1995.