In re: Cooper

Fourth Circuit

In re: Cooper

83 F. App'x 557

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2003·No. No. 03-7575·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Alvin Cooper petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because the district court recently dismissed Cooper’s § 2255 motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We [558] grant Cooper leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Alvin Cooper petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because the district court recently dismissed Cooper’s § 2255 motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We [558] grant Cooper leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

In re: Cooper, 83 F. App'x 557 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

83 F. App'x 557 (In re: Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related