In Re Cooley
143 A. 916, 103 N.J. Eq. 377, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 675
This text of 143 A. 916 (In Re Cooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re Cooley, 143 A. 916, 103 N.J. Eq. 377, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 675 (N.J. 1928).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, and reported in 95 N. J. Eq. 485.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Paekee, Mintubn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kerpelman
420 A.2d 940 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1980)
Delaware River and Bay Auth. v. INTERNATIONAL ORG. ETC.
211 A.2d 789 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)
In Re Wholesale, C., Salesmen's Union No. 20378
6 A.2d 660 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
143 A. 916, 103 N.J. Eq. 377, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cooley-nj-1928.