In re Cook

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Cook

647 A.2d 472, 138 N.J. 38, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 859

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedSeptember 30, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 647 A.2d 472 (In re Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cook, 647 A.2d 472, 138 N.J. 38, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 859 (N.J. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court, recommending that CECELIA F. COOK of VAUXHALL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, and who was thereafter temporarily suspended from practice on April 17, 1991, and who remains suspended at this time, be disbarred, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CECELIA F. COOK show cause before this Court on October 24,1994, at 2:00 p.m., in the Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, why she should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his desig-nee, present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent file an original and eight copies of her brief with the Clerk of the Court, and serve two copies of the brief on the Office of Attorney Ethics, on or before October 11, [39]*391994, and the Office of Attorney Ethics serve and file a responding brief, if any, on or before October 18, 1994; and it is further

ORDERED that this Order be published in two successive issues of the New Jersey Law Journal and the New Jersey Lawyer, and the Office of Attorney Ethics cause this Order to be published oh two successive days in a newspaper of general circulation in Union County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI