In Re Cook

11 S.E.2d 142, 218 N.C. 384, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 163
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 30, 1940·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The record discloses a proceeding in accordance with the provisions of Art. 3, ch. 103, of the Consolidated Statutes, which, in strictness, seems to be neither a civil action nor a special proceeding, notwithstanding C. S., 391. McIntosh on Procedure, 96.

It is not contemplated that there should be a jury trial of the issue in a matter of this kind. A justice of the peace may take the evidence and act in ease of emergency, when for any reason the clerk is not immediately available. C. S., 6195. No guardian is sought to be appointed to manage the property of the respondent, and hence the provisions of C. S., 2285, are not presently applicable.

*386 Moreover, there is no provision for an appeal from the order of the clerk to the Superior Court in a proceeding under this article. 'Whether certiorari would be available is not presented. In re Sylivant, 212 N. C., 343, 193 S. E., 422. The respondent may not call to his aid the provisions of C. S., 2302. There was evidence to support the order of the clerk.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Cook, 11 S.E.2d 142, 218 N.C. 384, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 163 (N.C. 1940).

11 S.E.2d 142 (In Re Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Phil Mechanic Const. Co., Inc. v. Haywood
325 S.E.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Matter of Mills
585 P.2d 1143 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)
In Re Appeal of Taylor
215 S.E.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
In Re Wilson
126 S.E.2d 489 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
In the Matter of Harris
84 S.E.2d 808 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
In Re Dunn
79 S.E.2d 921 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
In Re Jeffress
25 S.E.2d 845 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)