In re Conwell

Supreme Court of Kansas

In re Conwell

118 P.3d 176, 279 Kan. 1004, 2005 Kan. LEXIS 445

Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided June 30, 2005·No. No. 89,829·Published

Opinion

On May 30, 2003, the court placed the respondent, Gary L. Conwell, on supervised probation for a 2-year period. See In re Conwell, 275 Kan. 902, 69 P.3d 589 (2003). The respondent has filed an affidavit verifying his compliance with the conditions imposed on him by this court. The Disciplinary Administrator’s office verified that the respondent complied with the conditions and recommends that the respondent’s probation be terminated.

It Is Therefore Ordered that the respondent’s 2-year supervised probation be terminated.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports.

Dated this 30th day of June, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On May 30, 2003, the court placed the respondent, Gary L. Conwell, on supervised probation for a 2-year period. See In re Conwell, 275 Kan. 902, 69 P.3d 589 (2003). The respondent has filed an affidavit verifying his compliance with the conditions imposed on him by this court. The Disciplinary Administrator’s office verified that the respondent complied with the conditions and recommends that the respondent’s probation be terminated.

It Is Therefore Ordered that the respondent’s 2-year supervised probation be terminated.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports.

Dated this 30th day of June, 2005.

In re Conwell, 118 P.3d 176, 279 Kan. 1004, 2005 Kan. LEXIS 445 (kan 2005).

Pincite

118 P.3d 176 (In re Conwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related