MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE FIRST AND THE SECOND APPLICATIONS OF AL-THEIMER & GRAY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES
SUSAN PIERSON DeWITT, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Denying the First Application for Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses filed by Antonow & Fink, counsel for the Debtors, the Second Application for Fees and Expenses filed by Altheimer & Gray, on behalf of and as successor to Antonow & Fink, the Objection of the U.S. Trustee to the Debtor’s Second Application for Fees, the Objection of the Unsecured Creditors’ Committee for Sidney N. Weniger to the Second Application for Fees, and the Response and the Objection of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (“FSLIC”), as receiver for FirstSouth, F.A., to the Second Application. Now, therefore, for the reasons set forth below, the expense portions of the First and the Second
Applications for Fees and Expenses are granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
In the First Application for Fees and Expenses, Antonow & Fink requested attorneys’ fees in the amount of $502,749.50 and expenses in the amount of $42,946.50 for services performed and expenses incurred from February 11, 1987 through September 30, 1987. On June 1, 1988, the Court entered an Order denying Antonow & Fink’s Application primarily because counsel failed to allocate the fees among the seven separate estates. In response, Antonow & Fink filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the June 1, 1988 Order.
In its Second Application for Fees and Expenses, Altheimer & Gray, on behalf of and as successor to Antonow & Fink, requests $411,840.50 for fees and $41,638.93 in expenses for the time period from October 1, 1987 to June 30, 1988.
On November 18, 1988, the Court conducted a hearing on the Second Application for Fees and on the Motion for Reconsideration. At the hearing, the U.S. Trustee, the Unsecured Creditors’ Committee, and the FSLIC withdrew their objections based on Melanie Rovner Cohen’s representations that Altheimer & Gray would voluntarily reduce the amount of fees requested by $275,000.00, and furthermore, that four of the seven estates would be substantively consolidated.
On February 1, 1989, the Court, based on Melanie Rovner Cohen’s representations, entered an Order awarding Altheimer & Gray $639,590.00 in fees. However, the Court further ordered that the expense portions of the First and Second Applications remain under advisement. Thus, this Memorandum Opinion and Order will deal solely with the expense portions of the Applications.
ANALYSIS
Pursuant to Section 331 ,of the Bankruptcy Code, counsel for a debtor may apply to the court, not more than once every 120 days, unless the court orders otherwise, for compensation for services rendered and for reimbursement of expenses. Thus, the bankruptcy court has independent authority and responsibility to determine the reasonableness of compensation awarded.
In re Meade Land and Development Co., Inc.,
527 F.2d 280, 283 (3rd Cir.1975);
Matter of Affinito & Son, Inc.,
63 B.R. 495, 497 (Bankr.W.D.Pa.1986);
In re N.S. Garrott & Sons,
54 B.R. 221, 222 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1985);
In re Smith,
48 B.R. 375, 379 (Bankr.C.D.Ill.1984). Moreover, the applicant carries the burden of establishing that it is entitled to certain expenses.
Affinito,
63 B.R. at 497. The Court will not assume any expense is necessary.
See In re Lindberg Products, Inc.,
50 B.R. 220, 221 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1985);
In re Four Star Terminals, Inc.,
42 B.R. 419, 429 (Bankr.D.Alaska 1984);
In re Harman Supermarket, Inc.,
44 B.R. 918, 920 (Bankr.N.D.Va.1984).
Bankruptcy Rule 2016 provides that “an entity seeking interim or final compensation for services, or reimbursement of necessary expenses, from the estate shall file with the court an application setting forth a detailed statement of (1) the services rendered, time expended and expenses incurred, and (2) the amounts requested.” (emphasis added) The Application should contain a detailed list of expenses including the date, the type and the amount. Expenses must be actual not estimates.
In re Wildman,
72 B.R. 700, 731 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1987);
In re Marsh,
14 B.R. 615, 617 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1981). An expense is necessary if it was incurred because it was reasonably needed to accomplish the proper representation of the client.
Wildman,
72 B.R. at 731.
Expenses which are overhead are not compensable because they are built into the hourly rate.
See Wildman,
72 B.R. at 731;
In re Pacific Express, Inc.,
56 B.R. 859, 865 (Bankr.E.D.Cal.1985). Overhead,
for bankruptcy purposes, includes “all continuous administrative or general costs or expenses incident to the operation of the firm which cannot be attributed to a particular client or cost.”
In re Thacker,
48 B.R. 161, 164 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1985),
quoting, In re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc.,
47 B.R. 557, 584 (Bankr.D.Utah 1985).
Given the broad definition of overhead, the courts are split as to which expenses actually constitute overhead. Some bankruptcy courts deny reimbursement for meals
, word processing
, messenger service
, taxi fares and parking
, photocopying and postage
, express mail services
, and legal computer costs
. However, some courts hold that the aforementioned expenses are compensable.
See, e.g., In re Seneca Oil Company,
65 B.R. 902, 913 (Bankr.D.Kan.1986) (Photocopying, extraordinary postage, long distance telephone charges, computer research time, required out-of-town meals, lodging and transportation allowed if shown to be reasonable and necessary);
In re Thacker,
48 B.R. 161, 164 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1985) (Court fees, transcription fees, out-of-town travel expenses, delivery service, long distance telephone calls and postage expenses are not overhead.) While some courts allow photocopying charges, messenger charges, long distance telephone charges and travel expenses, some courts disallow those expenses when there is insufficient detail to determine whether the expenses are necessary or reasonable.
See, e.g., In re Thacker,
48 B.R. at 165;
In re Tolan,
41 B.R. 751, 756 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn.1984);
In re G.W.C. Financial & Insurance Services, Inc.,
8 B.R. 122, 127 (Bankr.C.D.Cal.1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE FIRST AND THE SECOND APPLICATIONS OF AL-THEIMER & GRAY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES
SUSAN PIERSON DeWITT, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Denying the First Application for Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses filed by Antonow & Fink, counsel for the Debtors, the Second Application for Fees and Expenses filed by Altheimer & Gray, on behalf of and as successor to Antonow & Fink, the Objection of the U.S. Trustee to the Debtor’s Second Application for Fees, the Objection of the Unsecured Creditors’ Committee for Sidney N. Weniger to the Second Application for Fees, and the Response and the Objection of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (“FSLIC”), as receiver for FirstSouth, F.A., to the Second Application. Now, therefore, for the reasons set forth below, the expense portions of the First and the Second
Applications for Fees and Expenses are granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
In the First Application for Fees and Expenses, Antonow & Fink requested attorneys’ fees in the amount of $502,749.50 and expenses in the amount of $42,946.50 for services performed and expenses incurred from February 11, 1987 through September 30, 1987. On June 1, 1988, the Court entered an Order denying Antonow & Fink’s Application primarily because counsel failed to allocate the fees among the seven separate estates. In response, Antonow & Fink filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the June 1, 1988 Order.
In its Second Application for Fees and Expenses, Altheimer & Gray, on behalf of and as successor to Antonow & Fink, requests $411,840.50 for fees and $41,638.93 in expenses for the time period from October 1, 1987 to June 30, 1988.
On November 18, 1988, the Court conducted a hearing on the Second Application for Fees and on the Motion for Reconsideration. At the hearing, the U.S. Trustee, the Unsecured Creditors’ Committee, and the FSLIC withdrew their objections based on Melanie Rovner Cohen’s representations that Altheimer & Gray would voluntarily reduce the amount of fees requested by $275,000.00, and furthermore, that four of the seven estates would be substantively consolidated.
On February 1, 1989, the Court, based on Melanie Rovner Cohen’s representations, entered an Order awarding Altheimer & Gray $639,590.00 in fees. However, the Court further ordered that the expense portions of the First and Second Applications remain under advisement. Thus, this Memorandum Opinion and Order will deal solely with the expense portions of the Applications.
ANALYSIS
Pursuant to Section 331 ,of the Bankruptcy Code, counsel for a debtor may apply to the court, not more than once every 120 days, unless the court orders otherwise, for compensation for services rendered and for reimbursement of expenses. Thus, the bankruptcy court has independent authority and responsibility to determine the reasonableness of compensation awarded.
In re Meade Land and Development Co., Inc.,
527 F.2d 280, 283 (3rd Cir.1975);
Matter of Affinito & Son, Inc.,
63 B.R. 495, 497 (Bankr.W.D.Pa.1986);
In re N.S. Garrott & Sons,
54 B.R. 221, 222 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1985);
In re Smith,
48 B.R. 375, 379 (Bankr.C.D.Ill.1984). Moreover, the applicant carries the burden of establishing that it is entitled to certain expenses.
Affinito,
63 B.R. at 497. The Court will not assume any expense is necessary.
See In re Lindberg Products, Inc.,
50 B.R. 220, 221 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1985);
In re Four Star Terminals, Inc.,
42 B.R. 419, 429 (Bankr.D.Alaska 1984);
In re Harman Supermarket, Inc.,
44 B.R. 918, 920 (Bankr.N.D.Va.1984).
Bankruptcy Rule 2016 provides that “an entity seeking interim or final compensation for services, or reimbursement of necessary expenses, from the estate shall file with the court an application setting forth a detailed statement of (1) the services rendered, time expended and expenses incurred, and (2) the amounts requested.” (emphasis added) The Application should contain a detailed list of expenses including the date, the type and the amount. Expenses must be actual not estimates.
In re Wildman,
72 B.R. 700, 731 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1987);
In re Marsh,
14 B.R. 615, 617 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1981). An expense is necessary if it was incurred because it was reasonably needed to accomplish the proper representation of the client.
Wildman,
72 B.R. at 731.
Expenses which are overhead are not compensable because they are built into the hourly rate.
See Wildman,
72 B.R. at 731;
In re Pacific Express, Inc.,
56 B.R. 859, 865 (Bankr.E.D.Cal.1985). Overhead,
for bankruptcy purposes, includes “all continuous administrative or general costs or expenses incident to the operation of the firm which cannot be attributed to a particular client or cost.”
In re Thacker,
48 B.R. 161, 164 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1985),
quoting, In re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc.,
47 B.R. 557, 584 (Bankr.D.Utah 1985).
Given the broad definition of overhead, the courts are split as to which expenses actually constitute overhead. Some bankruptcy courts deny reimbursement for meals
, word processing
, messenger service
, taxi fares and parking
, photocopying and postage
, express mail services
, and legal computer costs
. However, some courts hold that the aforementioned expenses are compensable.
See, e.g., In re Seneca Oil Company,
65 B.R. 902, 913 (Bankr.D.Kan.1986) (Photocopying, extraordinary postage, long distance telephone charges, computer research time, required out-of-town meals, lodging and transportation allowed if shown to be reasonable and necessary);
In re Thacker,
48 B.R. 161, 164 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1985) (Court fees, transcription fees, out-of-town travel expenses, delivery service, long distance telephone calls and postage expenses are not overhead.) While some courts allow photocopying charges, messenger charges, long distance telephone charges and travel expenses, some courts disallow those expenses when there is insufficient detail to determine whether the expenses are necessary or reasonable.
See, e.g., In re Thacker,
48 B.R. at 165;
In re Tolan,
41 B.R. 751, 756 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn.1984);
In re G.W.C. Financial & Insurance Services, Inc.,
8 B.R. 122, 127 (Bankr.C.D.Cal.1981).
In addition to the obvious overhead such as rent, taxes, insurance, lighting, and heating, the Court finds that, absent extraordinary circumstances, secretarial overtime charges, postage charges, messenger service charges, and express mail charges, are overhead and thus noncompensable. Additionally, the Court finds that, absent extraordinary circumstances, it will not reimburse an applicant for local meals and parking at the estate’s expense, and ultimately at the expense of the unsecured creditors.
In this case, the Court will address the expense entries in the First and Second Applications separately. In the First Application Altheimer & Gray requests $42,-946.50 in expenses. The Court categorized the expense entries into nine categories, postage charges, secretarial overtime charges, travel costs, meal expenses, Federal Express charges, taxicab charges for the messenger, messenger charges, general taxicab fares, and parking expenses. The Court will discuss each category separately.
First Application
A.
Postage Charges.
On Page 59 of the Application, Altheimer & Gray requests $32.25 for postage. The entry does not state the date the postage
expense was incurred, why it was incurred or what document was mailed. Moreover, the entry fails to state any extraordinary circumstances. Thus, the Court finds that the postage charge of $32.25 is overhead and is not compensable. Accordingly, that expense request will be denied. A proper compensable entry should read:
May 1, 1989 Postage to mail out 100 disclo- $32.25 sure statements.
B.
Secretarial Overtime Charge.
Additionally, on Page 59 of the Application, Altheimer & Gray requests $703.35 for secretarial overtime. The Court finds that secretarial overtime, absent extraordinary circumstances, is overhead and is therefore noncompensable. Even if secretarial overtime were compen-sable, the Court would have to deny the request because the entry fails to state who worked the overtime, why the person worked overtime and what matter the person worked on. A proper compensable entry should read:
May 1, 1989 Jane Doe, 5 hours overtime $142.00 working on emergency motion for cash collateral for May 2, 1989.
C.
Travel Costs.
The Court will deny the following travel cost entries because the Court is unable to determine where the attorney stayed and how much the hotel cost per night, where the attorney ate and how much the meal cost, how much was spent on other items and what matter the attorney was working on and because Altheimer & Gray failed to produce any backup documentation to clarify the matter
:
2/1/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or $ 171.50 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: Trip to New York on 2/1/87.
2/28/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or 101.36 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: Trip to Little Rock on 1/21-22/87.
2/28/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or 69.09 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: Trip to Little Rock, Arkansas on 1/6-7/87.
2/28/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or 1,672.66 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: Trip to New York, N.Y. 1/2— 2/1/87.
2/28/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or 281.47 miscellaneous for A.R. Cole re:
Trip to New York on 1/29-
3/17/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: Trip to New York on March 12-13, 1987. 116.50
3/17/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for M.K. Lippe re: Trip to New York March 12-13, 1987. 62.00
4/01/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: Trip to New York on April 22-23, 1987. 104.80
4/10/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for M.K. Thomas re: Trip to Philadelphia on April 6-7, 1987. 437.58
4/24/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for J. Wiener re: Trip to Philadelphia on April 22-24, 1987. 69.00
4/30/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for MRC re: Trip to NYC on 4-30-87. 94.75
4/30/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: Trip to New York on March 12-13, 1987. 200.90
4/30/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for M.K. Lippe re: Trip to New York on March 12-13, 1987. 210.21
5/31/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for MRC re: Trip to NYC on 4-30-87. 194.53
5/31/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for MRC re: Trip to NYC on 4-22-87. 207.76
5/31/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for JW re: Trip to Phil. PA on 4-22-87. 141.19
6/5/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for JW re: Trip to Phil Pa on 5-31 thru 6-3-87. 55.70
7/6/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: Trip to New York City on July-6-7, 1987. 80.00
7/6/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for A.R. Cole re: Trip to New York City on July 6-7, 1987. 47.00
7/8/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for J. Wiener re: Trip to Phil, PA on June 2, 1987. 73.23
7/8/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for J. Wiener re: Trip to Phil, PA on June 2, 1987. 73.23
7/8/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for J. Wiener re: Trip to Phil, PA on 6/2/87. 73.24
7/29/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for A.R. Cole re: Trip to Little Rock, Arkansas on July 27, 1987. 48.41
7/31/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for J. Wiener re: Trip to Philadelphia on May 31, 1987. 15.10
8/15/87 Travel Costs, Hotel, Meals and/or miscellaneous for JJM re: Trip to Panama City, Florida on 8-19-87. 110.00
8/21/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, Meals and/or $ 119.15 miscellaneous for J.J. Marwil re: Trip to Panama City, Florida.
8/31/87 A.R. Cole expenses for airline tick- 256.53 et upgrade, hotel and mise, re: trip to NYC on July 6-7, 1987.
8/31/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 224.75 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: Trip to NYC on July 6-7, 1987.
9/15/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 50.00 miscellaneous for ARC to Little Rock, Arkansas on 9-1-87.
9/24/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 87.60 miscellaneous for J. Wiener re: Trip to NYC on September 17, 1987.
9/28/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 90.10 miscellaneous for MRC re: Trip to New York City on 9/18— 9/22/87.
Total $5,539.34
The Court will not reimburse an Applicant for miscellaneous expenses which are not specifically set forth. A proper com-pensable entry for travel costs should read:
May 1, 1989 Travel Costs for John Doe to $128.59 New York City regarding sale of the Debtor’s property: Sheraton Inn — One Night at $110.00 per night. Dinner at Hotel $18.59
D.
Meal Expenses.
The Court will deny the following entries for reimbursement of local meal expenses because the Court is unable to determine either who was present at the meals, what the parties were working on while these alleged business meals were occurring, where the meetings occurred or why it was necessary to conduct the meetings over breakfast, lunch or dinner:
2/23/87 Luncheon Costs for Rosa Lopez re: $ 6.00 working.
2/28/87 Luncheon Costs at the Hyatt Regen- 30.70 cy for JAC, MKL, MRC, SNE, and S. Weniger.
2/28/87 Luncheon Costs for SNW, EW, 47.74 MRC, ARC, MKT, P. Varous and J. Grossman on 2/26/87.
3/9/87 Luncheon Costs for MKT, MRC, 16.55 JJM & ARC for general strategy meeting on 3/12/87.
3/30/87 Luncheon Meeting. 42.66
3/30/87 Luncheon Meeting-M.R. Cohen, 34.00 M.K. Thomas, and U.S. Trustee’s Rep. on 3/26/87.
4/17/87 Luncheon Costs for Alex Cole and 24.28 Sidney Weniger, et al on 4/15/87.
4/17/87 Luncheon Costs for A.R. Cole, SNE 29.40 WE, JW, G. Gentile, MKT and Larry McGraw on 4/16/87.
4/23/87 Luncheon costs for J.J. Marwil on 5.00 4/16/87.
4/23/87 Luncheon Costs on 4/22/87. 11.84
4/30/87 A.R. Cole breakfast meeting with 4.51 Weniger.
4/30/87 Luncheon Meeting A.R. Cole and $ 28.00 Weniger Group on 4/24/87.
5/12/87 Payee: JW-Drinks at East Bank 5.00 Club on 5/5/87.
5/19/87 Luncheon Costs-Sue Meckel. 7.10
5/19/87 Luncheon Costs Kim Cain. 13.25
5/19/87 Luncheon Costs. 29.97
5/27/87 Luncheon Costs re: Meeting. 18.36
6/2/87 Payee: Luncheon Expense for 9.67 AR?MRC on 5/21/87.
6/11/87 Payee: Dinner meeting at Standard 206.28 Club on 5/19/87-MRG.
6/12/87 Luncheon Costs. 11.93
6/26/87 Payee: Lunch expense with 40.84 clients — 6/25/87.
7/1/87 Luncheon Costs 6/20/87. 9.00
7/9/87 Payee: Lunch Expense on 7/1/87 19.82 MRC, ARC, JJM, JW.
8/12/87 Luncheon Costs for J.J. Marwil and 8.00 J. Wiener while working on brief.
8/25/87 Luncheon Costs for MRC, SNW, JW and JHW on 8/20/87. 24.70
9/10/87 Luncheon Costs for J.J. Marwil. 5.00
9/15/87 Luncheon Costs for J.J. Marwil. 4.00
9/15/87 Luncheon Costs for J. Wiener and 23.00 J.J. Marwil on 9/4/87.
9/22/87 The Carlton Club. 106.56
Total $823.16
Even if counsel could provide the Court with the necessary information, it is highly unlikely that counsel could prove that the meal expenses were reasonably necessary for the proper representation of the Debtor. For example, the Court finds it difficult to believe that counsel can prove that it was reasonably necessary to entertain the Debtor at such exclusive places as the Standard Club, the Carlton Club and the East Bank Club at the expense of the estate and ultimately at the expense of the unsecured creditors. The parties could just as easily conduct the meetings at the law firm. Moreover, the estate will not pay for the Debtor’s attorney’s airline upgrades or drinks. Furthermore, the Court finds that, except in very limited circumstances, local breakfast, lunch and dinner expenses for counsel are not compensable. If the attorney were not working on the case, he would still have to eat. Accordingly, the Court finds that, except in very limited circumstances, local meals are not reasonably necessary for the proper representation of the client. Moreover, a proper com-pensable entry for local meal reimbursement should read:
May 1, 1989 Lunch at the Hyatt for Attor- $25.40 ney Doe and Attorney Smith in preparation for afternoon hearing on cash collateral on May 1, 1989.
E.
Federal Express Charges.
The Court will deny the following requests for reimbursement of Federal Express charges because the entries fail to state what was delivered, when it was delivered, to whom it was delivered, and why the United States Postal Service was not used:
2/20/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
3/11/87 Federal Express Charges 48.75
3/16/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
3/31/87 Federal Express Charges (4) 59.25
4/30/87 Federal Express Charges 40.00
4/30/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
4/30/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
5/31/87 Federal Express Charges 68.25
5/31/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
5/31/87 Federal Express Charges 19.50
5/31/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
6/9/87 Federal Express Charges 222.00
6/9/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
6/9/87 Federal Express Charges 20.00
6/19/87 Federal Express Charges 19.50
6/19/87 Federal Express Charges 2.44
6/19/87 Federal Express Charges 7.29
6/19/87 Federal Express Charges 2.44
6/19/87 Federal Express Charges 2.44
6/19/87 Federal Express Charges 7.33
6/19/87 Federal Express Charges 7.30
6/19/87 Federal Express Charges 2.43
6/29/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
6/29/87 Federal Express Charges 88.25
6/29/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
6/29/87 Federal Express Charges 19.75
7/6/87 Federal Express Charges 39.00
7/8/87 Federal Express Charges 58.75
7/22/87 Federal Express Charges 108.00
8/31/87 Federal Express Charges 176.00
8/31/87 Federal Express Charges 88.25
9/30/87 Federal Express Charges 158.39
9/30/87 Federal Express Charges 39.00
9/30/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
9/30/87 Federal Express Charges 49.75
9/30/87 Federal Express Charges 49.25
9/30/87 Federal Express Charges 49.75
9/30/87 Federal Express Charges 39.00
9/30/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
9/30/87 Federal Express Charges 9.75
9/30/87 Federal Express Charges 49.75
Total $1,658.81
A proper compensable request for federal express charges should read:
May 1, 1989 Federal Express 50 copies of the $58.00 Disclosure Statement to the service list for hearing on May 5, 1989.
F.
Taxicab Charges for Messengers.
At the hearing, Melanie Rovner Cohen represented to the Court that, for efficiency purposes, the firm’s in-house messengers are taxied over to the courthouse to file documents. She further testified that the messengers are often sent over to file more than one document at any one time and that such cost for the taxicab is apportioned among the various cases in which the documents are filed. The Court will deny the following 'requests for taxicab fare reimbursement because the Court is unable to determine who the messenger was, what was delivered or filed and, in some instances, whether the firm allocated the fare among several cases:
2/17/87 Taxicabs Messenger from Federal $ 2.80 Court on 2/13/87.
2/28/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 2/23/87.
2/28/87 Taxicabs Messenger to Federal 2.60 Court on 2/18/87.
3/23/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 6.00 Court on 3/11/87.
3/23/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 3/18/87.
3/30/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from 6.50 Federal Court on 3/26/87.
3/30/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 7.00 Court on 3/23.
4/3/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 7.50 Federal Court and 175 W. Jackson on 3/27/87.
4/3/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 4/2/87.
4/10/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.60 Federal Court on 4/1/87.
4/10/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 6.00 Federal Court on 4/2/87.
4/10/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.60 Federal Court on 4/3/87.
4/10/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 4/3/87.
4/10/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 6.00 Court on 4/7/87.
4/17/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.60 Federal Court and 175 S. LaSalle on 4/13/87.
4/23/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 7.00 Federal Court and 175 W. Jackson on 4/15/87.
4/30/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 4/23/87.
4/30/87 Taxicab Messenger from 1 S. Wack- 3.00 er on 4/24/87.
4/30/87 Taxicabs Messenger to Federal 3.00 Court on 4/24/87.
4/30/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 4/28/87.
5/6/87 Taxicabs Messenger-to and from 5.60 Federal Court.
5/6/87 Taxicabs-messenger-to Federal 10.00 Court and return (twice).
5/6/87 Taxicabs messenger-to and from 5.00 Federal Court.
5/12/87 Taxicabs messenger-to and from 5.00 Federal Court.
5/27/87 Taxicabs messenger — to and from 6.00 Federal Court.
5/27/87 Taxicabs messenger-to and from 180 4.00 N. LaSalle.
5/27/87 Taxicabs messenger-to and from 5.00 Federal Court.
6/8/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal Court- 5.60 messenger.
6/8/87 Taxicabs to Federal Court and re- 6.00 turn-messenger.
6/12/87 Taxicabs to and from 30 N. LaSalle- 5.00 messenger.
6/12/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal Court- $ 5.00 messenger.
6/12/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal Build- 6.00 ing JKC-per JW.
6/18/87 Taxicabs to 111 W. Monroe-messen- 3.00 ger.
6/18/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal Court- 5.00 messenger.
6/23/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal Court- 5.00 messenger.
6/23/87 Taxicabs from Federal Court and 3.00 Harris Bank-messenger.
6/23/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal Court- 3.00 messenger.
6/23/87 Taxicabs 219 S. Dearborne [sic] and 6.00 return-messenger.
6/26/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal Court- 6.00 messenger.
6/26/87 Taxicabs to 30 N. LaSalle-messen- 8.00 ger.
6/26/87 Taxicabs to Federal Court and re- 6.00 turn-messenger.
6/26/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal Court- 6.00 messenger.
7/1/87 Taxicabs to Federal Court and ret. 6.00 messenger.
7/9/87 Taxicabs to 11 E. Adams and return- 6.00 messenger.
7/9/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal Court- 5.60 messenger.
7/9/87 Taxicabs to One First National Pla- 6.00 za-messenger.
7/20/87 Taxicabs to 1 S. Wacker and return- 7.00 messenger.
7/24/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 6.00 Federal Court on 7/22/87.
7/24/87 Taxicabs to and from 200 Chestnut 5.00 on 7/22/87.
8/5/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.00 Court on 8/4/87.
8/12/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 6.00 Bankruptcy Court on 8/9/87.
8/19/87 Taxicabs Messenger to Three First 5.00 National Plaza on 8/13/87.
8/25/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 219 7.50 S. Dearborn and One First National Plaza on 8/20/87.
8/25/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 175 8.00 W. Jackson and One First National Plaza on 8/19/87.
8/25/87 Taxicabs Messenger to One First 5.00 National Plaza on 8/19/87.
8/27/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 6.00 Federal Court on 8/24/87.
9/1/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 7.50 Riverside Plaza on 8/28/87.
9/1/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 69 5.00 W. Washington on 8/28/87.
9/1/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 70 7.00 W. Erie on 8/28/87.
9/4/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 5.60 Federal Court on 9/3/87.
9/10/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 3.00 Federal Court on 9/2/87.
9/15/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 6.00 Federal Court re: late filing on 9/11/87.
9/15/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 219 6.00 S. Dearborn on 9/10/87.
9/17/87 Taxicabs Messenger to 321 N. Clark 6.00 on 9/18/87.
9/17/87 Taxicabs for Messenger on 9/15/87. 5.00
9/17/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 219 6.00 S. Dearborn on 9/15/87.
9/17/87 Taxicabs Messenger to and from 6.00 Court on 9/16/87.
9/21/87 Taxicabs Messenger to Federal $ 6.00 Building and Copying on 9/17/87.
Total $376.60
A proper compensable entry for cabfare should read:
May 1, 1989 Cabfare for Joe Smith to 30 N. $7.50 LaSalle to deliver Emergency Application for use of Cash Collateral.
G.
General Taxicab Fare Requests
The Court will deny the following taxicab fare reimbursement requests because the Court is unable to determine either who incurred the expense, why the expense was incurred, or what the party was working on, and thus the Court is unable to determine why the estate should pay for cabs to and from the train, to the attorneys’ homes and to private clubs and ultimately whether the expense was necessary and reasonable.
2/23/87 Taxicabs Rosa Lopez re working OT $ 12.70 on 2/21/87.
2/23/87 Taxicabs J. Wiener to office on 12.00 2/22/87.
3/16/87 Taxicabs A.R. Cole to train on 2.50 3/10/87.
4/3/87 Taxicabs M.K. Thomas to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 3/31/87.
4/30/87 Taxicabs A.R. Cole to train on 2.50 4/14/87.
4/30/87 Taxicabs for A.R. Cole and J. Wien- 25.00 er on 4/15/87.
5/12/87 Taxicabs JW-cab home from East 4.00 Bank Club on 5-5-87.
5/12/87 Taxicabs JW-cab to East Bank Club. 3.75
5/19/87 Taxicabs to Federal Court and Re- 6.00 turn.
5/27/87 Taxicabs JW 7.50
6/2/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal Court 6.00 on 5-29-87.
6/8/87 Payee: Transportation exp.-worked 9.50 overtime-Rosa Lopez.
6/8/87 Taxicabs to 219 S. Dearborn-Maggie 8.00
6/12/87 Taxicabs ARC 3.25
6/18/87 Taxicabs to work on 6-4-87-JW 4.50
6/18/87 Taxicabs to and from Federal 5.60 Court-Jerry B.
6/18/87 Taxicabs to Schultz on 6-10-87-JW 4.00
6/18/87 Taxicabs to and from Cook County 4.00 Law Library-Bob Goldstein.
6/23/87 Taxicabs to train-Rosa Lopez-6-18- 2.00 87
6/23/87 Taxicabs from 175 W. Jackson-Rosa 2.80 Lopez.
7/16/87 Taxicabs to and from Library-B. 6.00 Goldstein.
7/30/87 Taxicabs to and from work on Sun- 10.00 day-JKC.
8/5/87 Taxicabs R.G. Goldstein to and from 11.00 Kent Library and Xeroxing at Library.
8/12/87 Taxicabs A.R. Cole to train after 2.50 working late on 8/5/87.
8/12/87 Taxicabs R.G. Goldstein to Cook 4.00 County Library to get N.Y. Jurisprudence.
8/19/87 Taxicabs R. Goldstein to and from 6.00 library on 8/14/87.
8/25/87 Taxicabs ARC, SNW, and JW on $ 30.00 8/20/87.
9/15/87 Taxicabs J.J. Marwil on 9/9/87. 6.50
9/17/87 Taxicabs J. Wiener on 9/12/87. 2.00
Total $208.60
May 1, 1989 Cabfare for John Doe from the $4.50 firm to Kent Library to research issue on New York court’s jurisdiction to hear contract issue.
H.
Messenger Charges.
The Court will deny the following entries for reimbursement of messenger charges because the Court is unable to determine what was delivered, where it was delivered or why it was delivered instead of mailed:
2/25/87 Arrow Messenger Service $ 5.00
3/19/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.00
3/19/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.00
3/26/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.00
4/16/87 Arrow Messenger Service 9.00
4/28/87 Arrow Messenger Service 15.00
5/11/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.00
5/11/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.00
5/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 11.00
5/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5-19-87 5.00
5/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5-20-87 10.00
5/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service (4) 5-5- 20.00 87
5/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5-7-87 5.00
5/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5-15-87 5.00
5/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5-7-87 5.00 JW
5/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5-6-87 5.00
6/9/87 Arrow Messenger Service (9) 5- 45.00 29-87
6/18/87 Arrow Messenger Service 10.00
6/30/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.00
7/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 116.00
7/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 3.50
7/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 40.00
7/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 65.00
7/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 100.00
7/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.00
7/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 55.00
8/30/87 Arrow Messenger Service 154.50
8/30/87 Arrow Messenger Service 10.00
8/30/87 Arrow Messenger Service 92.00
8/31/87 Arrow Messenger Service 25.00
9/22/87 Arrow Messenger Service 89.00
9/22/87 Arrow Messenger Service 70.00
9/22/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.00
9/22/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.00
9/22/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.00
9/28/87 Arrow Messenger Service 290.00
9/28/87 Arrow Messenger Service 150.00
9/28/87 Arrow Messenger Service 5.50
9/28/87 Arrow Messenger Service 6.00
Total $1,471.50
A proper compensable entry for messenger expenses incurred should read:
May 1, 1989 Arrow Messenger Service-deliv- $55.00 ered Disclosure Statement to service list.
t
Parking Expenses.
The Court finds that, absent extraordinary circumstances, local parking expenses are noncompensable because they are not reasonably necessary to the proper representation of the client. An attorney ordinarily bears the cost of getting to and from the office. In this case, the Court will deny the following entries because they lack any explanation of extraordinary circumstances and because they either fail to state why the expense was incurred or where it was incurred:
2/23/87 Parking for A.R. Cole on 2/16/87 $ 13.00 and 2/21/87.
3/31/87 Payee: System Parking, Ine.-Park- 9.00 ing Pees for Prank Monfeli on February 26, 1987.
4/30/87 Parking for J. Wiener on 4/18/87. 8.00
6/18/87 Parking exp. 6-11-87-JW 10.00
7/24/87 Parking for J.K. Chatz on 7/18 and 16.00 7/19/87.
7/28/87 J. Wiener-Parking on 7/18/87. 10.00
8/5/87 Parking for J. Wiener on 7/25/87. 5.00
8/27/87 Parking for J. Wiener on 8/22/87. 10.00
9/10/87 J.J. Marwil-Early Morning Parking 5.50 on 9/3/87.
9/15/87 Parking Expenses for J. Wiener on 10.00 9/12/87.
9/24/87 Parking for J. Wiener on 9/19/87. 10.00
9/30/87 Parking Expenses for J.J. Marwil on 5.50 9/28/87.
Total $112.00
A proper compensable request for parking expense reimbursement should read:
May 1, 1989 Parking for John Doe at O'Hare $18.00 for Trip to New York.
Accordingly, the Court will award Al-theimer and Gray $32,020.89 as and for the reimbursement of expenses requested in the First Application which covers the time period from February 11, 1987 to September 30, 1987.
Second Application
The Court has categorized the Second Application expense request into eleven categories; secretarial overtime charges, postage charges, copy charges, travel costs, meal expenses, Federal Express charges, messenger charges, taxicab charges for the messenger, general taxicab fares, parking expenses and. art supplies. Now therefore, for the reasons set forth above, the Court will deny the following entries in each category.
A.
Secretarial Overtime Charges.
Summarized Cod Overtime - Secretarial $1,473.12
B.
Postage Charges.
Summarized Cod Postage $ 205.47
C.
Copy Charges
11/25/87 Record Copy Services re: various $1,432.20 documents.
11/30/87 Hotel Copy Centers, Inc. 214.80
Total $1,647.00
D.
Travel Costs.
10/02/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or $ 450.81 miscellaneous for J.J. Marwil re: trip to New York City on 9/20/87.
10/13/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 60.00 miscellaneous for A.R. Cole re: trip to Dallas on October 8, 1987.
10/30/87 John K. Chatz-Reimbursement for 854.66 travel expenses re: trips to Little Rock and New York City on 10/19-23/87.
10/31/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 973.30 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: trip to New York City on 9/18-22/87.
10/31/87 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 54.55 miscellaneous for J. Wiener re: trip to New York City on 9/17— 18/87.
1/21/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 162.60 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: trip to New York City on 1/19/88.
1/31/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 222.84 miscellaneous for J. Wiener trip to New York City on 9/17-18/87.
1/31/88 The Westin Plaza for additional 12.45 charges J.M. Ward in New York.
2/29/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 114.10 miscellaneous for MRC re: trip to Dallas, TX on 2/11-12/88.
2/29/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 107.25 miscellaneous for JJM re: trip to NYC on 1/19-22/88.
2/29/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 150.00 miscellaneous for JJM re: trip to NYC on 1/7-8/88.
2/29/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 160.00 miscellaneous for JJM re: trip to NYC.
2/29/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 286.66 miscellaneous for J.J. Marwil re: trip to New York City on January 1-22, 1988.
2/29/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 243.48 miscellaneous for J.J. Marwil re: trip to New York City on January 7-8, 1988.
2/29/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 242.21 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: trip to New York on January 17-20, 1988.
3/31/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 139.45 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: trip to Dallas, Texas on February 11-12, 1988.
4/13/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 139.00 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: trip to New York.
5/03/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or $ 205.00 miscellaneous for JJM re: trip to NYC on 5/3-5/88.
5/16/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 86.20 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: trip to New York City on March 3-6, 1988.
5/31/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 222.84 miscellaneous for J.J. Marwil re: trip to NYC on 5/3-4/88.
6/24/88 Travel Costs-Hotel, meals and/or 315.49 miscellaneous for M.R. Cohen re: trip to New York City on 5/3-6/88.
Total $5,202.89
E.Meal Expenses.
10/06/87 Dinner expense for J.J. Marwil on $ 8.00 10/6/87.
10/09/87 Luncheon costs for SNW, JW and 10.94 JJM on 10/6/87.
10/22/87 Luncheon expenses on 10/5/87. 6.50
10/27/87 Dinner expenses re: working late 12.00 on 10/21/87.
10/27/87 Dinner expenses re: working late 6.00 on 10/23/87.
11/10/87 Dinner costs for D. Cygan re: late 6.00 work on Fee Petition.
11/12/87 Dinner costs for D. Cygan and L. 12.00 Stephenson re: late work on Fee Petition 11/11/87.
11/10/87 Dinner costs for D. Cygan and L. 12.00 Stephenson on 11/10/87 re: working on Fee Petition.
11/16/87 Breakfast meeting with S. Weni- 5.00 ger on 11/12/87.
11/19/87 Luncheon Expenses re: Weninger 28.94 (MRC).
11/24/87 Luncheon Costs for SNW and JW 6.50 on 11/23/87.
12/01/87 Luncheon Costs for clients on 10.58 11/24/87.
12/03/87 Luncheon Costs for MRC, Shelton 16.58 and Lansfield on 12/2/87.
12/03/87 Luncheon Costs for P. Perrey re: 6.00 working late on 12/1/87.
12/03/87 Dinner expense for J.J. Marwil re: 11.00 working late on 12/2/87.
12/03/87 Dinner Costs for J.J. Marwil re: 11.00 working late 12/1/87.
12/08/87 Luncheon Costs for M.R. Cohen 59.37 and Weniger at the Standard Club.
12/11/87 Luncheon Costs re: working on 6.00 Fee Petition 12/9/87.
12/15/87 Luncheon Costs for S.N. Weniger 6.08 on 12/10/87.
12/17/87 Luncheon Costs for S.N. Weniger 4.35 on 12/15/87.
12/22/87 Luncheon Costs for S.N. Weniger 7.35 and M.R. Cohen on 12/16/87.
12/22/87 Luncheon Costs for J.J. Marwil re: 5.00 meeting w/SNW re: working on Plan 12/16/87.
12/23/87 Luncheon Costs for JJM and MRC 11.00 on 12/22/87.
1/20/88 Luncheon Costs for J. Wiener and 10.00 J.J. Marwil on 1/19/88.
2/02/88 Luncheon Expenses for J.J. Mar- 5.00 wil on 1/28/88.
2/08/88 Luncheon Costs M.R. Cohen and 24.29 Miller at the Standard Club.
2/11/88 Luncheon Costs for S. Weniger on 5.11 2/9/88.
2/11/88 Luncheon Costs for M.R. Cohen $ 9.70 and A.R. Cole on 2/9/88.
2/12/88 Breakfast for SNW on 2/9/88. 1.67
2/18/88 Luncheon Costs for M.R. Cohen, 18.00 S. Weniger and J. Wiener on 2/19/88.
2/29/88 Luncheon Costs with Smolev, ARC 28.57 and MRC on January 10, 1988.
3/15/88 Luncheon Costs on 3/10/88. 3.00
4/08/88 Luncheon Costs at Standard Club 111.09 —M.R. Cohen, S.N. Weniger, Catlett Fleming et al.
4/19/88 Luncheon Meeting with MRC, JJM 45.90 and clients from Wengroup.
4/28/88 Luncheon expenses for M.R. Co- 9.18 hen and S. Weniger.
5/03/88 Luncheon Costs for SNW on 1.67 4/25/88.
5/19/88 Luncheon expense for Weniger on 2.00 5/18/88.
6/09/88 Luncheon Costs for J.J. Marwil on 5.00 6/8/88 (Harwen Motion).
6/24/88 Luncheon Costs for J.M. Ward on 24.49 5/10/88.
Total $572.86
F.
Federal Express Charges.
10/31/87 Federal Express Charges $ 282.75
10/31/87 Federal Express Charges 19.50
10/31/87 Federal Express Charges 9.92
10/31/87 Federal Express Charges 9.91
10/31/87 Federal Express Charges 9.92
6/29/88 Federal Express Charges 10.75
6/29/88 Federal Express Charges 97.50
Summarized Cod ' 2,501.91
Total $2,942.16
G.
Messenger Charges.
10/26/87 Arrow Messenger Ser- $ 51.40 vice
10/26/87 Arrow Messenger Ser- 70.00 vice
10/26/87 Arrow Messenger Ser- 5.00 , vice
10/31/87 Arrow Messenger Ser- 34.00 vice
10/31/87 Arrow Messenger Ser- 40.00 vice
6/29/88 Messenger Service 111.00
Summarized Cod Messenger Charges 1,428.50
Total $1,739.90
H.
Taxicab Charges for Messengers.
10/06/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from $ 6.00 Federal Court on 10/1/87.
10/06/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 9/30/87.
10/06/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.40 Federal Court on 10/1/87.
10/09/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.60 Federal Court on 10/5/87.
10/09/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from 6.00 Federal Court on 10/6/87.
10/22/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from 4.50 Federal Court on 10/16/87.
10/29/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 10/26/87.
10/06/87 Taxicabs messenger from Federal 2.50 Court on 10/19/87.
11/24/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 11/23/87.
12/01/87 Taxicabs messenger to Federal 3.00 Court on 11/25/87.
12/01/87 Taxicabs messenger to Bankrupt- 3.00 cy Court on 11/25/87.
12/03/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 11/20/87. $ 5.00
12/08/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from Bankruptcy Court on 12/03/87. 6.00
12/10/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from Bankruptcy Court; Three First National; and Quaker Oats on 12/9/87. 11.00
12/10/87 Taxicabs messenger to Federal Court on 12/2/87. 3.00
12/10/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from Bankruptcy Court on 12/08/87. 6.00
12/11/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 11/23/87. 4.45
12/11/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from Three First National Plaza on 12/10/87. 5.00
12/22/87 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 12/17/87. 3.00
12/23/87 Taxicabs messenger to Federal Court on 12/22/87. 2.60
1/08/88 Taxicabs messenger from Federal Court on 1/07/88. 2.50
1/08/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 1/06/88. 5.00
1/19/88 Taxicabs messenger to Bankruptcy Court on 1/12/88. 5.00
1/28/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 1/07/88. 5.00
2/02/88 Taxicabs messenger to Quaker Tower on 1/29/88. 5.00
2/02/88 Taxicabs messenger to Quaker Tower on 1/28/88. 5.00
2/02/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 1/28/88. 5.00
2/02/88 Taxicabs messenger to 3 First National Plaza on 1/28/88. 2.60
2/02/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 1/13/88. 5.00
2/02/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 1/27/88. 5.00
2/04/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Bankruptcy Court re: Filing on 2/3/88. 5.00
2/04/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 400 S. LaSalle on 2/2/88. 6.00
2/04/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 2/2/88. 5.00
2/04/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 2/1/88. 5.00
2/09/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 2/3/88. 5.00
2/09/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 2/2/88. 5.00
2/12/88 Taxicabs messenger from Federal Court on 2/11/88. 2.25
2/23/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 2/19/88. 5.00
2/25/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Two First National Plaza and Quaker Tower on 2/22/88. 9.00
2/25/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 2/23/88. 5.00
2/25/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 2/22/88. 6.00
2/29/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 2/24/88. 5.00
3/10/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Bankruptcy Court on 3/9/88. 6.00
3/10/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 3/8/88. 5.00
3/16/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Federal Court on 3/1/88 3.00!
3/24/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Three First National Plaza and Quaker Tower on 3/22/88. 9.00
3/24/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from Standard Club on 3/22/88. 6.00
3/29/88 Taxicabs messenger to Federal $ 3.00 Court on 3/24/88.
3/29/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 3/23/88.
4/05/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 6.00 Bankruptcy Court on 3/31/88.
4/12/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 4/11/88.
4/12/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.00 Judge De Witt’s Chambers on 4/27/88.
4/12/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 6.00 Court on 4/7/88.
4/19/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.00 Judge De Witt’s Chambers on 4/13/88.
4/19/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 4/14/88.
4/28/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 2.50 Federal Court on 4/21/88.
5/03/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 6.00 Federal Court on 4/2/88.
5/17/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 6.00 Federal Court on 5/16/88.
5/19/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 6.50 321 N. Clark on 5/18/88.
5/19/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 6.00 Bankruptcy Court on 5/16/88.
6/07/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 5/31/88.
6/07/88 Taxicabs messenger to and from 5.00 Federal Court on 6/2/88.
6/30/88 Taxicabs — messenger to One First 7.00 National Plaza and 321 N. Clark.
6/30/88 Taxicabs — messenger—to and 5.00 from Gardner and Cartnon [sic] and Douglas.
Total $323.40
I.Taxicab Fare Charges.
10/06/87 Taxicabs J.J. Marwil on 10/5/87. $ 6.00
10/09/87 Taxicabs J. Wiener to restaurant 6.50 and home on 10/5/87.
10/22/87 Taxicabs J.H. Pinkert to and from 5.50 Northwestern Library on 10/19/87.
10/27/87 Taxicabs on 10/23/87 re: working 19.00 on Fee Petition.
11/10/87 Taxicabs for D. Cygan re: late 17.00 work on Fee Petition.
11/12/87 Taxicabs D. Cygan home re: late 17.00 work on Fee Petition 11/11/87.
11/12/87 Taxicabs D. Cygan on 11/11/87 re: 17.00 late work on Fee Petition.
11/12/87 Taxicabs M.E. Leipold to home af- 6.00 ter late work 11/9/87.
11/12/87 Taxicabs M.E. Leipold. 12.00
11/16/87 Taxicabs J. Wiener to restaurant 3.00 on 11/11/87.
11/19/87 Taxicabs A.R. Cole to train after 2.75 late work on 11/2/87.
12/03/87 Taxicabs P. Perrey home re: 12.50 working late on 12/2/87.
12/03/87 Taxicabs J. Wiener on 11/30/87. 4.25
12/10/87 Taxicabs D. Cygan re: working on 17.00 Fee Petition on 12/09/87.
12/11/87 Taxicabs D. Cygan re: working on 17.00 Fee Petition on 12/10/87.
12/10/87 Taxicabs D. Cygan re: working 17.00 late on Fee Petition 12/10/87.
1/08/88 Taxicabs J.K. Chatz to and from 12.00 office 1/3/88.
3/03/88 Taxicabs T.R. McFadden to North- 3.00 western Law Library.
3/08/88 Taxicabs J. Wiener on 3/3/88. $ 5.00
4/07/88 Taxicabs M.R. McFadden to 3.00 , Northwestern on 4/5/88.
4/26/88 Taxicabs S.M. Zamek to and from 4.25 Cook County Library on 4/25/88.
6/09/88 Taxicabs K. Carlson to and from 6.00 Bankruptcy Court on 6/8/88.
6/27/88 Taxicabs D. Cygan on 6/23/88 re: 17.00 late work on Fee Petition.
Total $229.75
J.
Parking.
10/27/87 Parking expenses on 10/21/87 re: $ 9.00 working on fee petition.
12/03/87 Parking expenses for J.J. Marwil 10.00 re: working late on 12/2/87.
12/03/87 Parking expenses for J.J. Marwil 10.00 re: working late 12/1/87.
12/03/87 Parking expenses for J.J. Marwil 9.00 on 11/30/87.
12/08/87 Parking expenses for J.K. Chatz 9.00 re: late work on Fee Petition 11/24/87.
2/23/88 Parking for J.J. Marwil on 11.00 2/21/88.
3/24/88 Early morning parking for J.J. 10.00 Marwil on 3/24/88.
6/15/88 Parking expenses for J.J. Marwil 5.50 re: late work on 6/14/88.
Total $73.50
K.
Art Supplies.
12/11/87 Sheldons Art Supply for Posters $31.54 and Pens.
Total $31.54
The Court hereby denies the request for $31.54 for art supplies because art supplies, absent extraordinary circumstances, are overhead, and Altheimer and Gray failed to set forth any extraordinary circumstances. A compensable entry should read:
May 1, 1989 Paper and Posterboard for $10.00 preparation Charts and Diagrams for Hearing on Sale of Property.
In summary, the Court will award Al-theimer and Gray $27,197.34 for the expenses requested in the Second Application covering the time period from October 1, 1987 to June 30, 1988.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Al-theimer & Gray is awarded $59,218.23 for the expenses requested in the First and. Second Applications. IT IS HEREBY: FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to the parties’ agreement, the Debtor shall pay said award as follows:
After payment of the Interim Fee Allowance, Weniger shall cause to be paid the outstanding balance of the Disbursements Allowance from one-third of any
of the Debtors’ net proceeds received from the sale of Apartment 3B at 40 East 80th Street, Lot 7 in Little Rock, Arkansas or 638 Dune Road, West Hampton Beach, New York.