In re Continental Guaranty Corp.

212 A.D. 246, 208 N.Y.S. 714, 1925 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9447
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Continental Guaranty Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 A.D. 236
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1925·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Dowling, J.:

In the accompanying appeal (Matter of Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Craig, No. 1, 212 App. Div. 236) the order setting aside the verdict for petitioner and directing a verdict for respondents, which is the basis of the present order dismissing the proceeding, has been reversed and the verdict of the jury reinstated. The order now under consideration should, therefore, be reversed, with costs to appellant, and the motion to dismiss the alternative mandamus order and the petition filed herein and to grant the costs of the proceeding to defendants should be denied, with ten dollars costs. And the proceeding is remitted to Special Term for the entry of an appropriate order upon the reinstated verdict of the jury in favor of the petitioner herein.

Clarke, P. J., Merrell and McAvoy, JJ., concur; Burr, J., dissents.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, and the proceeding remitted to the court at Special Term for the entry of an appropriate order upon the reinstated verdict of the jury in favor of the relator [petitioner] herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Continental Guaranty Corp., 212 A.D. 246, 208 N.Y.S. 714, 1925 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

212 A.D. 246 (In re Continental Guaranty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Continental Guaranty Corp.
212 A.D. 236 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)