In re Contempt of Marshall
This text of 880 N.E.2d 924 (In re Contempt of Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cuyahoga App. No. 88780, 2007-Ohio-6639. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s emergency consideration for immediate stay of execution of judgment pending appeal,
It is ordered by the court that the emergency consideration for stay is denied.
It further appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due February 7, 2008, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
880 N.E.2d 924, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-contempt-of-marshall-ohio-2008.