In re Contempt of Breen

30 Nev. 186
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1908·No. No. 1738·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The facts upon which this proceeding was based are fully stated in the proceeding for disbarment this day determined. (30 Nev. 164.) It is the opinion of the court that the purpose for which citation was issued in the contempt proceeding has been fully accomplished in the proceedings for disbarment. If the respondent were adjudged guilty of contempt for the language complained of, the punishment imposed would be in the nature of a double punishment, which the court has no disposition to impose, and in consideration of the judgment rendered, in the disbarment proceeding this day, this proceeding is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Contempt of Breen, 30 Nev. 186 (Neb. 1908).

30 Nev. 186 (In re Contempt of Breen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Morris
227 P. 914 (California Supreme Court, 1924)