In re Contempt of Breen

30 Nev. 186
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1908
DocketNo. 1738
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 Nev. 186 (In re Contempt of Breen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Contempt of Breen, 30 Nev. 186 (Neb. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The facts upon which this proceeding was based are fully stated in the proceeding for disbarment this day determined. (30 Nev. 164.) It is the opinion of the court that the purpose for which citation was issued in the contempt proceeding has been fully accomplished in the proceedings for disbarment. If the respondent were adjudged guilty of contempt for the language complained of, the punishment imposed would be in the nature of a double punishment, which the court has no disposition to impose, and in consideration of the judgment rendered, in the disbarment proceeding this day, this proceeding is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Morris
227 P. 914 (California Supreme Court, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Nev. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-contempt-of-breen-nev-1908.